Lufthansa's rainy day fund

Never mind Lufthansa's current financial difficulties, which I wrote about yesterday - the German carrier is intent on keeping clouds out of the picture with its new "sunshine guarantee". If you're on vacation and your day's a washout, don't worry - Lufthansa will give you 20 euros (approx. $30) for each rainy day of your vacation, up to 200 euros. "If the sunny stay hoped for by many is spoiled by rain, maybe 20 euros compensation ...will brighten the mood," the airline said, quoted by AFP. In order to qualify, the German weather website wetteronline.de must show at least five millimeters of precipitation at your vacation destination (one of 36 eligible cities), and your flights have to be booked between now and August 18 and must be flown from Germany between September and October.

Some of the destinations - Abu Dhabi, Tel Aviv, Dubai, Cairo, Madrid, Barcelona - all seem like pretty fair weather cities, so the money that isn't spent there can be spent on other cities that are also covered in the deal, like New York and Washington, which have a lot more rain (especially this summer!) than those other cities.

photo by So Cal Metro from Flickr

Lufthansa allowed to purchase Austrian

German carrier Lufthansa recently got the go-ahead from the EU Commission to purchase Austrian Airlines, but maybe it will have reason to re-think its decision in a few months. After all, Austrian recently reported a 78.5 million Euro ($113 million) loss between April and June, and has lost 166.6 million Euros ($239.8 million) for the first half of the year. Lufthansa, on the other hand, managed to obtain an operating profit of 8 million euros ($11.5 million) from January to June, although it also posted a net loss of 216 million euros ($311 million). The EU Commission has approved the takeover, and although a final decision is expected in a couple of weeks, the deal's pretty much as good as done. Of course, Lufthansa had to make some concessions in order to avoid running afoul of the European antitrust policies, giving up some prime take-off and landing slots at Vienna's airport.

Some remain optimistic about Lufthansa's financial future. "We remain optimistic from a mid-term perspective," said one analyst. "Lufthansa has impressively demonstrated that it is able to reach a small profit even in a disastrous environment." "Based on its superior financial strength and its anti-cyclical approach to acquisitions, we expect Lufthansa to emerge as a long-term winner from the current global economic crisis," said another. Yet it's clear that in the short term, Lufthansa faces some serious struggles; not only does it have to cope with the weak demand for travel, but also the purchases of Austrian, bmi, and Brussels Airlines. Austrian, for its part, has been quickly racking up debt - almost two billion euros of it, which is over five times its equity.

Still, Lufthansa apparently thinks that it can turn around Austrian and make it profitable. And while this isn't an unrealistic expectation (and it helps that a new cost-cutting program was introduced at Austrian last week), this particular acquisition poses some interesting challenges. Two of Lufthansa's earlier purchases, Swiss and Brussels Airlines, are relatively new airlines, having been formed in the past decade. They were both created out of the ashes/assets of two historic but loss-making carriers, Swissair and Sabena, which both failed in 2002. This allowed Lufthansa to take over some choice assets without dealing with the incredible debt burden that caused the two airlines to collapse.

Austrian, as I mentioned before, has almost two euros in debt, and that number isn't likely to shrink anytime soon. A 200 million euro government bailout earlier this year is the only thing keeping the airline afloat, and it's already burned through two-thirds of that cash. Niki Lauda, founder of Austrian subsidiary Lauda Air and now founder of budget airline flyniki, has claimed that the deal is the "biggest catastrophe [for Austria] since World War II." "It takes no skill to give away an airline and then still pay 500 million euros on top of that," he said, referring to the fact that the Austrian government has agreed to absorb a third of Austrian's debt.

Still, Lauda got some good slots at Vienna thanks to the deal, so he can't be all that upset. And Lufthansa, if it manages to get Austrian's house back in order, could end up profiting from Austrian's extensive Southern and Eastern European route network. So it will take quite a bit of work, but that's something that Lufthansa and its CEO, himself a native Austrian, is willing to put forth.

Lufthansa struggles with Austrian purchase

Lufthansa has been really putting together quite the airline empire over the last few years, acquiring Swiss Air Lines, Italian carrier Air Dolomiti, and German carriers Germanwings and Eurowings outright, as well as purchasing large stakes in British airline bmi and Brussels Airlines (and will own the latter outright by 2011).

It's also trying to wrap up a deal to take over Austrian Airlines in its entirety, although the plan has dragged on for a long time, thanks to roadblocks from the anti-trust unit of the European Commission, which is concerned about a lack of competition on some European routes. Lufthansa has already apparently agreed to more concessions, including dropping flights between Vienna and Frankfurt and Vienna and Geneva, but it's unclear whether or not this will be enough for the EC.

Austrian has been bleeding red ink recently; the airline lost 429 million euros last year, has more than one billion euros in debt, and has already burned through two thirds of a 200 million euro injection from the Austrian government that it received this spring. Its chairman has said that if the Lufthansa deal falls through, the airline would need over one billion euros in new capital. Austrian's future is being increasingly called into question as the prospects for the deal's success look dimmer.

And meanwhile, Lufthansa is also struggling (although not to the same extent as Austrian). The Austrian deal, with a deadline of July 31, is still dragging on and on and becoming ever more expensive, and Lufthansa is looking at ways to lower acquisition costs. It also reluctantly purchased fifty percent of bmi from its founder, Sir Michael Bishop, who for many years held an option that would force Lufthansa to buy his stake. Bishop actually ended up suing Lufthansa back in May in order to make Lufthansa proceed faster with the deal.

But the deals with Austrian, bmi and Brussels have contributed to Lufthansa's increasing financial pressures. The airline today announced that it would roll out a costs-saving initiative called "Climb 2011," which calls for savings of one billion euros ($1.4 billion) per year starting in 2011. The plan focuses on lowering passenger costs as well as shedding 20% of its 2,000 office jobs in its passenger airline core business. Lufthansa has also said that it will defer delivery of some aircraft from 2010.

Depending upon how many further obstacles it receives from the EC, Lufthansa might just decide to axe the takeover of Austrian, especially as the costs of a takeover mount and Austrian's financial situation becomes more and more perilous. Austrian could be looking less and less attractive, especially while Lufthansa digests the the financial burden of taking over bmi and Brussels. With the global airline industry stuck in a deep downturn, Lufthansa needs make sure that it doesn't bite off more than it can chew, and should concentrate on solidifying its core operations - after all, that airline empire is no good if the carrier at the center of things isn't strong.

photo by caribb from Flickr, licensed under the Creative Commons

Continental allowed to join Star Alliance immunity pact

The Department of Transportation ignored a recommendation from the Department of Justice that Continental Airlines not be allowed to join nine other Star Alliance carriers in recieving antitrust immunity on international routes, and instead granted it permission earlier today. (Thanks for the heads up from Airline Route.)

The airlines (Air Canada, Austrian, bmi, LOT, Lufthansa, Scandinavian, Swiss, TAP, United and now Continental) can benefit from "limited and carefully considered" antitrust immunity on international routes, saying that "the transaction will not substantially reduce or eliminate competition."

In its ruling, the DOT also stated that the Continental's joining "does not materially alter the competitive landscape or increase overall market share to any significant degree," noting that Continental's move to Star allows for "a more competitive alliance in markets where oneworld or SkyTeam have a strong presence."

The DOT also noted that Continental currently overlaps with other Star carriers in fourteen city-pair markets, but stated that creating "carve outs" (routes that are not covered by the antitrust immunity) would "detract from the efficiencies that the alliance would otherwise create." Existing "carve outs," such as Chicago-Frankfurt, Washington-Frankfurt, San Francisco-Toronto and Chicago-Toronto, are still in effect. As for domestic competition (especially with United), the DOT concluded that "the benefits of the alliance outweigh the comparatively small risk of harm that could occur in domestic markets."

Of course, the whole argument of alliances being good for the consumer only stands if "metal neutrality" is practiced. "Metal neutrality" is when airlines that jointly market services aren't picky about who actually operates the flight (and thus keep more of the revenue). For example, if I wanted to fly from Boston to Frankfurt as seamlessly as possible, I could take a direct Lufthansa flight, or instead fly United through Washington Dulles. If I book my ticket with United Airlines, under "metal neutrality" they'd put me on the Lufthansa flight, even though they'd make much less money than if they put me on their flight through Washington. If things are kept metal-neutral, the DOT argues, then carriers won't spend time worrying about making sure that a passenger flies on their airline; instead, they can work on syncing their flight schedules and sharing financial benefits and losses, which give them incentive to make things as convenient as possible to the passenger.

photo by James Willamor on Flickr, licensed under the Creative Commons

Auf wiedersehen to Lufthansa's A300s

The last Lufthansa Airbus A300 flight flew earlier today, as the culmination of the airline's plans to phase out the 26-strong fleet. Lufthansa flight 3853, operated by aircraft D-AIAM, left Rome and arrived in Frankfurt shortly past 9:00am local time. The A300s have been a key part of Lufthansa's 'continental' fleet since 1987, and the airline used them extensively on inter-European routes. But the A300s got the axe as part of a cost-cutting plan that Lufthansa has implemented, which is expected to save €300 million ($420 million).

American Airlines, another big A300 operator, is also expected to retire the last of its A300s this year on August 24th. Those of you who have yet to fly on an A300 (myself included) might want to look at booking tickets before it's too late...

photo by eigjb on Flickr

Problems ahead for global airline alliance immunity

The Department of Justice recently expressed objections to the antitrust immunity agreement that nine Star Alliance carriers (plus Continental, which will be a Star member later this year) are seeking. The airlines, which include United, Lufthansa, Air Canada, SAS and Swiss (but notably, not US Airways), have been looking to obtain global immunity from antitrust laws for some time now. In April, the Department of Transportation gave the carriers a tentative green light, but last Friday, the DOJ instead called on the DOT to "deny the broad requested immunity and instead grant a more limited immunity" - probably just a more limited transatlantic cooperation.

Right now, Continental technically competes with Star Alliance members on its routes, but under the proposed immunity agreement, that competition would be eliminated. The DOJ went further in its explanation, saying that Asian and Latin American routes flown by United and Continental would probably see price increases, as the airlines would no longer be competing. And the DOJ also took fault at some transatlantic routes; Continental has a pretty extensive list of European destinations, and the DOJ said that competition on some routes between the US and some of those cities would decrease substantially.

So, what implications does this have? First, it shows that the federal government is getting more serious about enforcing anti-trust policies, especially under the new presidential administration (as had been expected). Secondly, it could have serious effects for a similar agreement that rival alliance oneworld is trying to put together, and could be in the shape of things to come for such global agreements. And the DOJ statement also goes after cooperation between United and Continental on domestic US routes; "a sweeping grant of immunity raises significant concerns about harm to domestic competition," it said - something that might indicate obstacles to a potential United-Continental merger.

photo by caribb

As BA hurts, Iberia looks to Air France, Lufthansa

photo by jmiguel.rodriguez

The relationship between British Airways and Spanish carrier Iberia runs long and deep. BA owns 13.5% of Iberia and has two seats on its board, and the two airlines are members of the oneworld alliance. The airlines have been pursuing a merger for a while now, and back in February, Iberia chairman Fernando Conte said that a 'preliminary decision' on a merger would be arrived at in March. But only a few weeks ago, Spanish airline Iberia said that it indefinitely postponed the timeline for finishing up merger talks with British Airways; chairman Fernando Conte said that Iberia should instead "concentrate on the reestablishment of its financial solidity." Yet it's interesting how the announcement came right around the time that British Airways announced a record loss and reports emerged about how the carrier is struggling with a pension plan deficit of at least £1.2 billion ($2 billion). BA CEO Willie Walsh has even said that the airline "is in a fight for survival."

Hmm... coincidence?

Probably not. Although talks between BA and Iberia are still continuing, it's clear that Iberia is starting to question the financial viability of its British partner, and so reports that it's looking for a future partner with stronger financial performance aren't surprising. Iberia's finance director, Enrique Dupuy, said Wednesday that Iberia can't hold its own against what he called airline "megagroups", namely, Air France-KLM and Lufthansa. "A merger with BA is a good fit for Iberia, but a merger with Lufthansa or Air France would be quite a good fit as well," Dupuy said. "We have spent a lot of time examining these alternatives, and of course they are not ruled out, perhaps the most attractive aim is British Airways but we also have very attractive alternatives."

In a statement to The Airline Blog, Iberia's international press manager Santiago de Juan made clear that as of now, the only deal being negotiated is between Iberia and BA: "Mr. Dupuy said something Iberia has been saying for some time now, which is that Iberia wants to play an important role in the consolidation process the airline industry is going through. That means that Iberia has analysed the different possibilities for this consolidation process, Air France and Lufthansa included, but at this moment Iberia is in merger talks with British Airways and it is NOT in merger talks with [Lufthansa or Air France]." de Juan would not comment on whether Iberia's recent look at 'different possibilities' had anything to do with BA's financial trouble.

O'Leary: Ryanair interested in takeover of Lufthansa

photo by lorentey

European budget airline Ryanair head Michael O'Leary might have a history of making rather outlandish statements, and the announcement that he made this morning that Ryanair is "seriously interested" in taking over Lufthansa is no exception. According to an orf.at article, Ryanair "could almost buy [Lufthansa] in cash," according to O'Leary. This statement has been backed up over at the Financial Times, which also reports that O'Leary plans on expanding Ryanair's fleet by 15% and that the airline has 90% of the year's fuel hedged at $62 a barrel. According to financial results released on Ryanair's website today, Ryanair now is the largest airline in Europe by both traffic and market capitalization (€5.3 billion vs. €4.5 billion for second-place Lufthansa).

Lufthansa declined to comment on O'Leary's comments, although shares of the airline were trading higher on the Frankfurt stock exchange. And while I suppose that a takeover of Lufthansa could never be ruled out totally, I'm inclined to believe that O'Leary, being the king of free media attention, is just up to his usual tactics of getting some press coverage (or maybe even distract the media a bit from its announcement this morning of a lowered profit this year). A Ryanair takeover of Lufthansa just isn't realistic.

Lufthansa's bmi takeover drama continues

photo by Ingy The Wingy

Although the takeover of British carrier bmi (formerly known as British Midland Airways) by German airline Lufthansa was approved on Thursday by European Union antitrust authorities, the German newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung yesterday reported that Lufthansa is backing out of the deal, apparently after taking a closer look at bmi's rather precarious financial situation and deciding that the price would be too high.

bmi, which lost $151m in 2008, was 30% (minus one share) owned by Lufthansa, 20% by Scandinavian Airlines, and 50% (plus one share) by former British Midland chairman Sir Michael Bishop. Last October, Lufthansa announced that it would be acquiring Bishop's stake in bmi, meaning that the German carrier would be effectively controlling bmi.

bmi is one of the latest of Lufthansa's potential acquisitions; it already wholly owns Italian carrier Air Dolomiti, German low-cost carrier Germanwings, Swiss International Air Lines, Lufthansa Italia, and regional carriers Eurowings and Lufthansa CityLine, among others (it will wholly control Austrian Airlines pending approval by the EU later this year). It also owns significant stakes in bmi, Luxembourg's national airline Luxair, Belgian carrier Brussels Airlines, and jetBlue.

Continental gets approval to join Star Alliance

photo by bribriTO

Continental Airlines yesterday received a tentative OK to join Star Alliance, although the US Department of Transportation will require Continental, United, Air Canada and Lufthansa to release an 'annual report' on the alliance. Star Alliance is already by far the largest airline alliance, and the addition of Continental just makes it even bigger. As such, the US government has expressed concern about the impact on competition - and so has Delta, Continental's current partner in the SkyTeam alliance, which has complained that the impact on US domestic routes would be too large, given that United and US Airways are already members.

American's new deal with BA, Iberia

American Airlines, Iberia, and British Airways announced earlier today that they were forming a three-way alliance that would allow them to cooperate on flights between Europe and North America. Although the three airlines are already part of the oneworld alliance, the deal allows them to work more closely together and to cut costs. Not surprising, Virgin Atlantic's Richard Branson took a dim view of the deal, which he said would create a "monster monopoly".

The announcement comes at a time when other airlines are also seeking to link up: United, Continental, Air Canada and Lufthansa are working on a transatlantic alliance, similar to the AA/Iberia/BA one announced today.

Austrian's 50th anniversary colors

photo courtesy of Austrian Airlines

To celebrate its 50th anniversary, Austrian Airlines has painted an Airbus A320 (OE-LBP) in a "retro" colors. Austrian's first flight was on March 31, 1958, from Vienna to London (via Zurich) on a Vickers Viscount. Austrian is the latest European airline to commission such a livery - others, such as Lufthansa and SAS, have done so as well.

United would consider leaving Star Alliance

photo by striatic

According to United Airlines CEO Glenn Tilton, if United had to leave Star Alliance in order to finalize a merger, it was prepared to do so. "You can assume that absolutely everything goes into the mix of consideration," he said in a Chicago Tribune article published yesterday. The quote has sparked rampant speculation on internet forums as to whether or not United would actually seriously consider withdrawing from Star. United is one of Star's founding members, and is close partners with another founding member, Lufthansa. United makes a lot of money off of the feed that it gets from Star members (and vice versa).

There's no reaction yet from Lufthansa, arguably United's closest member. United does provide Lufthansa with a significant amount of connecting traffic, and losing United wouldn't be good. Lufthansa has covered its bases in the US market a bit with last year's investment in jetBlue, but jetBlue can't give them anywhere near the same amount of feed that United can. Perhaps Tilton's comments might be meant to scare Lufthansa into making an investment in United (as it did in jetBlue) - in this case, United's ties with Lufthansa and Star would probably be stronger than ever.

Of course, all of this is assuming that United is actually serious about leaving Star. United will probably remain in Star as long as it is financially viable; if a better alternative arises, United will probably do the sensible thing and 'go for it', even if this means dropping in Star in favor of another alliance. (A United-Delta or United-Continental merger might mean that the airline could join SkyTeam, but this seems more likely with the former.) For United, the most important item on the agenda is making money, and if this means merging with another carrier and leaving Star, then a United-less Star could indeed be a possibility.

Lufthansa to buy stake in jetBlue

jetBlue announced earlier today that Lufthansa would "make a minority equity investment" in jetBlue. The agreement between the two airlines states that Lufthansa will buy about 42 million newly issued shares of jetBlue (19% of the airline) at $7.27 a share, about $300 million. Lufthansa would also get a seat on jetBlue's Board of Directors. (Per US law, Lufthansa would be limited to under 25% voting rights.)

Lufthansa CEO Wolfgang Mayrhuber said that Lufthansa was "very pleased to become an investor in JetBlue" and that "this investment presents Lufthansa with a compelling opportunity to invest in the U.S. point-to-point carrier market as the industry continues to evolve." Dave Barger, jetBlue CEO, was pleased with "this significant endorsement of JetBlue's franchise from one of the most respected leaders in global aviation" and said that the investment "will also improve our balance sheet and give us greater financial flexibility as we move into 2008."

In a conference call this afternoon, it was revealed that Lufthansa was the one that approached jetBlue (sometime during the late summer). The deal should close sometime during the first quarter in 2008. This seems to have been the right time for Lufthansa to move in for a deal; shares of jetBlue are relatively cheap at the moment, and the airline could use some extra cash. jetBlue has had some trouble over the past years with high oil prices and increased competition (especially now that Virgin America's competing in the transcontinental market). Shares of jetBlue have fallen by half since last February's mess at JFK involving passengers stranded on planes for several hours, an event which damaged the airline's reputation. In addition, with the low value of the dollar versus the euro, Lufthansa's getting a pretty good bargain.

As of now, the two airlines haven't said that they would cooperate in any areas other than "operation cooperation". No code-share deal was announced, either, and besides, jetBlue's reservation system doesn't allow for code-sharing (at least not yet). If the airlines were to integrate schedules, Lufthansa would certainly benefit from US domestic feed at JFK. Then again, Lufthansa's premium passengers might not want to go from Lufthansa's premium classes of service to jetBlue's all-economy service (even if they do have DirecTV).

But there are still a few unanswered questions. Lufthansa is close partners with United Airlines and US Airways, all three of which are Star Alliance members. It's unknown if Lufthansa's US partners had any say-so in the deal or not, or what the potential ramifications of the deal are for the two. And there's no word yet if this could eventually lead to jetBlue becoming a Star Alliance member. United has been rumored to be interested in jetBlue as a potential merger partner, and if Lufthansa were to increase their stake to 25% and if United were to buy 26%, then the two airlines would have a controlling interest in jetBlue. Right now Lufthansa is limited to 25% ownership, like all foreign carriers, but if this cap is lifted (and with the Open Skies deal announced earlier this year, it might be soon), then Lufthansa might eventually purchase a controlling stake in jetBlue.

MAXjet suspends shares

“Boutique airline” MAXjet Airways today requested that its shares be suspended in advance of a statement from the airline about its rather precarious financial situation. MAXjet flies five Boeing 767-200s from London-Stanstead to three US cities (JFK, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles) with around 100 leather seats apiece and four-course meals (not to mention champagne cocktails and canapés). The airline went public in June, but has since flown into a rough patch (their stock has fallen 50% and new route from London to Washington was axed, in addition to planned service to Miami starting next February).

Not all the news is negative, though. MAXjet carried 47% more passengers last month than it did last November, while the airline’s load factor increased 11% to 69%. But although more seats are being filled, MAXjet is finding it harder to make money. Lots of factors – increased competition with carriers like Silverjet and EOS, high oil prices, and a weak US dollar (which particularly affects an airline with so much UK-based traffic) could be to blame. The airline’s loss increased to $49.5 million in the first half of 2007, up from $30.4 million in the same period a year ago.

According to MAXjet, everything is business as usual, for now. The airline’s announcement about its finances, according to a statement released by the airline, will “be made as soon as possible”. “The company wishes to confirm to its employees, customers and suppliers that business continues to function as normal.” Whether or not MAXjet will be able to get over this remains to be seen – the transatlantic business travel market is notoriously competitive, and with British Airways getting in on the game soon, things aren’t likely to ease up. If BA arch-rivals Air France or Lufthansa also consider entering the premium transatlantic market at a more competitive rate (and Lufthansa has already made moves towards doing this), they could seriously jeopardize the futures of all-business class airlines like MAXjet.

Three interested in Alitalia

photo by WTL photos

Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi recently said that Air France/KLM, Lufthansa, and Italian domestic carrier Air One were interested in making a bid for struggling Alitalia. (Previously interested Aeroflot has already quit the bidding.) All bidders have until December 6 to make a non-binding offer. In an interview with the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, Lufthansa CEO Wolfgang Mayrhruber said that "Alitalia has big and barely manageable problems. We are studying whether we can find a recipe (to fix these) and make a bid."

It should be pointed out that Alitalia is losing about 1 million euros a day and is affected by frequent strikes (both inside and outside of the company). If one of those airlines is going to make a bid for Alitalia, they'll have to deal with "big and barely manageable problems" indeed.

United international route rumors

photo: "N646UA", by Drewski2112

There have been a few rumors floating around that United Airlines might start some new international routes. Among them:

• Chicago - Moscow. Aeroflot used to fly this route but stopped in 2001, and United holds the dormant route authority for the route, which it obtained in a deal with Pan Am back in 1991. (If United did fly this route, it would probably skip Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport (SVO) and instead fly to Domodedovo Airport (DME) because its fellow Star Alliance carriers fly there.) But the US-Russia market is currently served by a lot of routes - Delta flies Moscow - Atlanta and Moscow - New York (JFK), and Aeroflot flies Moscow - New York (JFK), Los Angeles, and Washington (IAD).
  
• Chicago - Milan. If United did fly this route, it would compete with Alitalia.
• Chicago - Düsseldorf. United used to fly this route but stopped in 2001. Star Alliance partner Lufthansa flies it with an Airbus A319, but is supposed to upgrade the route to an Airbus A330 in May.

It has also been rumored that United would upgrade some of its Boeing 767-300s, including a switch from a two-class domestic configuration to a three-class international one, and an engine upgrade. These upgraded 767s would be used on the route.

Lufthansa economy-class sleeping area?

Recently on both Airliners.net and FlyerTalk.com there have been rumors floating around of Lufthansa introducing an economy-class sleeping area on overnight intercontinental flights. In an email survey that the airline recently sent out, one of the questions was:

To increase the travel comfort on intercontinental night flights, Lufthansa is thinking about a separate sleeping area within Economy Class. There, you would have the possibility to sleep in beds with an angle of 180° (Full Flat). This option could be booked instead of a seat.

In the future, when booking a night flight with Lufthansa from Johannesburg to Frankfurt, would you generally be interested in booking into the sleeping area instead of a seat in Economy Class?

Apparently Lufthansa also included a picture of the 'sleeping area' (see above; click on it to see the larger version). While it might raise some safety issues (could the bunks be occupied during takeoff/landing?), it certainly might be worth a try on a fifteen hour overnight flight, especially when compared to regular economy-class seating on Lufthansa.

AiRUnion moves towards Star as S7 joins oneworld

Lufthansa announced on Wednesday that it will begin codesharing with the Russian airline alliance AiRUnion, which is made up of the carriers Domodedovo Airlines, KrasAir, Omskavia, Samara Airlines, and Sibaviatrans. The deal will help Lufthansa, which serves eight cities within Russia, create domestic connections. Likewise, the AiRUnion carriers will have access to Lufthansa's international network.

While the deal doesn't make AiRUnion a member of Star Alliance, of which Lufthansa is a founding member, it does move the Russian alliance closer to Star. AiRUnion already codeshares with Star carrier Austrian Airlines on the Moscow-Vienna and Krasnoyarsk-Vienna routes.

Novosibirsk-based S7 Airlines, Russia's number-two carrier, also announced a few weeks ago that it was in talks with British Airways to join the oneworld alliance. Aeroflot, the country's largest airline, is already a member of SkyTeam. So because there are three major airlines/groups in Russia (Aeroflot, S7, AiRUnion) and there are three major world airline alliances (SkyTeam, oneworld, Star), it would make sense that AiRUnion will probably become a Star member in the coming months.

Ryanair to sue EU as EC investigates Ryanair

European discount carrier Ryanair has said that it will sue the European Commission, the antitrust regulatory body of the EU, because it failed to look into complaints about state aid given to Air France and Lufthansa.

Ryanair alleges that Air France received discounted airport fees from the French government and that Munich airport in Germany is building a new terminal for Lufthansa, even while the airport loses money. Ryanair also accuses the EC of approving "mulitbillion bailout packages" for Alitalia, while Olympic Airways has benefited from "massive injections of state aid" from the Greek government.

At the same time, the European Commission has launched an investigation into government aid grants by Finland and Germany for regional airports - the kind that Ryanair typically uses. The EC ruled a few years ago that the airline received illegal aid at Charleroi Airport, in Belgium, and Ryanair had to pay part of it back.